StockData
Airsculpt Technologies, Inc. logo

Airsculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS) stock analysis

AIRSNasdaqServices-Offices & Clinics of Doctors of MedicineFiscal year ends December 31
Financials through Q3 FY2026, quarter ended Sep 30, 2026Last filing: 10-Q on Nov 6, 2026Score 4/30
$0.81+0.04 (+4.54%)

Close on Nov 11, 2026Market cap $58.07MP/E –Yield –

StockData Score

Prices as of Nov 11, 2026How the score works

Value2Growth1Performance0Health1Dividend0

Weak4 of 30 checks passed

Airsculpt Technologies passes 4 of the 30 checks behind our score; 14 could not be run for lack of data and count as not passed. Each dot in the shape is one check — hover it for the numbers.

Valuation
2/6
Growth
1/6
Past performance
0/6
Financial health
1/6
Dividend
0/6

What stands out

  • Low debt

    Debt is 34.6% of shareholders' equity, under the 40% we consider low.

  • EV/EBITDA below its 5-year median

    Airsculpt Technologies's EV/EBITDA of 16.0 is below its 5-year median of 37.4.

  • P/B below the industry

    Airsculpt Technologies's price-to-book of 0.55 is below the Health Services median of 3.52.

  • Gross margin improving

    Gross margin was 60.2% over the last twelve months, against 59.0% a year earlier.

What to watch

  • Return on equity under 15%

    Return on equity was -10.1% over the last twelve months and averaged -7.2% over five years; we look for 15% on both.

  • Return on capital under 10%

    Return on invested capital was -4.2%, below the 10% that usually covers the cost of capital.

  • Revenue growing under 10% a year

    Revenue grew -3.5% a year over the last three fiscal years, short of the 10% we look for.

  • Interest not well covered

    Operating income covers interest expense -1.4 times; we look for at least 5.

Valuation2/6
  • P/E against its history

    Not enough price and earnings history to compare.

  • P/E against the industry

    Needs positive earnings and enough profitable companies in the industry.

  • EV/EBITDA below its 5-year median

    Airsculpt Technologies's EV/EBITDA of 16.0 is below its 5-year median of 37.4.

  • P/B below the industry

    Airsculpt Technologies's price-to-book of 0.55 is below the Health Services median of 3.52.

  • Price against fair value

    We could not estimate a fair value: it needs at least two valuation methods with positive inputs.

  • Margin of safety

    Depends on the fair value estimate.

Growth1/6
  • Revenue growing under 10% a year

    Revenue grew -3.5% a year over the last three fiscal years, short of the 10% we look for.

  • EPS growth over 3 years

    Needs positive EPS three years ago and today.

  • Earnings acceleration

    Needs positive net income now, a year ago and five years ago.

  • Growing slower than the industry

    Revenue grew -6.3% over the last twelve months; the Health Services median is -0.0%.

  • Guidance issued

    The latest outlook (full year 2026 revenue, Aug 10, 2026) was issued for the first time, so it neither adds nor takes away points.

  • Gross margin improving

    Gross margin was 60.2% over the last twelve months, against 59.0% a year earlier.

Past performance0/6
  • Return on equity under 15%

    Return on equity was -10.1% over the last twelve months and averaged -7.2% over five years; we look for 15% on both.

  • Return on capital under 10%

    Return on invested capital was -4.2%, below the 10% that usually covers the cost of capital.

  • Return on equity below the industry

    Airsculpt Technologies's return on equity of -10.1% is below the Health Services median of 4.6%.

  • Earnings over 5 years

    Needs positive net income five years ago and in the latest year.

  • Net margin below its 5-year average

    Net margin was -6.4% over the last twelve months, against a 5-year average of -3.0%.

  • Net margin below the industry

    Airsculpt Technologies's net margin of -6.4% is below the Health Services median of -6.3%.

Financial health1/6
  • Low debt

    Debt is 34.6% of shareholders' equity, under the 40% we consider low.

  • Debt trend

    Needs a balance sheet from five years ago with positive equity.

  • Debt not well covered by cash flow

    Operating cash flow over the last twelve months equals -5.4% of total debt; we look for at least 20%.

  • Interest not well covered

    Operating income covers interest expense -1.4 times; we look for at least 5.

  • Short-term assets don't cover short-term debts

    Current assets are 0.85 times current liabilities.

  • Elevated bankruptcy risk

    The Altman Z-score is 0.68; above 3 is the safe zone and below 1.8 the distress zone.

Dividend0/6
  • No dividend

    Airsculpt Technologies has not paid a dividend in the last twelve months.

  • Yield against Treasuries

    No dividend.

  • Yield against the market

    No dividend.

  • Dividend stability

    No dividend.

  • Earnings cover

    No dividend.

  • Cash-flow cover

    No dividend.

Scores of similar companies

We don't publish a fair value for Airsculpt Technologies. It needs a US-dollar share price, at least two valuation methods with positive inputs (earnings, EBITDA, book value or sales) and, for companies with several share classes, classes that trade at the same price.

Valuation over time

Using the earnings and balance sheet published at each date, not today's.

  • EV/EBITDA at month end
  • Own 5-year median 37.4
  • Health Services median 16.2

An estimate from reported numbers and market multiples, not a price target or investment advice. It can be far off for companies whose profits are about to change sharply.

Market risk

From the past year of daily prices.

Liquidity

High risk

Average value traded per day
$1.51M
Value traded per 1% price move
$267.44K

Downside

High risk

Typical loss in a bad month
53.3%
Volatility (annualized)
141%
Sharpe ratio, 1 year
-0.65
Beta to the S&P 500 (5Y)
2.44

Typical bad-month loss, week by week

25%: high

Margins

Share of revenue, fiscal years 2018 to 2025

Gross margin

59.4%−3.2 pts over 5 years

Operating margin

-7.6%−23.6 pts over 5 years

Net margin

-7.7%−19.8 pts over 5 years

See a number that looks wrong?