Airsculpt Technologies vs Concord Medical Services
AIRS and CCM side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIRS and CCM compare
Concord Medical Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.9% versus −6.3% for Airsculpt Technologies).
Airsculpt Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.4% compared with −20.2% at Concord Medical Services.
Airsculpt Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Concord Medical Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIRS | CCM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.3M | – |
| Share price | $0.837 | $3.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −86.3% | −24.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.4% | −85.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.47 | 0.32 |
| Employees | 330 | 610 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.4× | – |
| P/B | 0.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.5× | – |
| FCF yield | −4.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.3% | 19.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.3% (better) | 15.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.2% (better) | 5.6% |
| Operating margin | −4.7% (better) | −56.8% |
| Net margin | −6.4% (better) | −20.2% |
| FCF margin | −1.7% (better) | −56.1% |
| Return on equity | −10.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −4.2% (better) | −19.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.35 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.33 | – |
| Interest coverage | −1.4× (better) | −1.7× |
| Current ratio | 0.85 (better) | 0.48 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.70 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −52.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −52.5% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.3% | 0.03% |
| Held by insiders | 76.6% | 0.83% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.1% | – |
Go deeper
- AIRS stock overview
- AIRS income statement
- AIRS valuation and score
- CCM stock overview
- CCM income statement
- CCM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.