Take Two Interactive Software vs Unity Software
TTWO and U side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TTWO and U compare
Take Two Interactive Software is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Unity Software ($42.4B against $22.1B).
Unity Software grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 3.1% for Take Two Interactive Software).
Take Two Interactive Software keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.8% compared with −15.6% at Unity Software.
Take Two Interactive Software scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Unity Software), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TTWO | U |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $42.4B | $22.1B |
| Share price | $226.95 | $50.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.7% | 21.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 33.1% | −73.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 2.50 |
| Employees | 13K | 4,412 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 6.6× (better) | 10.1× |
| P/B | 11.6× | 6.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 2924× | 486× (better) |
| P/FCF | 433× | 36.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.23% | 2.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $108.04 | $6.70 |
| Margin of safety | −110% (better) | −649% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.1% | 20.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.6% | 19.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.6% | 67.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.8% (better) | −17.9% |
| Net margin | −3.8% (better) | −15.6% |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −6.8% (better) | −10.5% |
| Return on invested capital | −3.2% (better) | −32.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.69 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 57.18 | – |
| Interest coverage | −1.3× (better) | −16.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | 2.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.01 (better) | 3.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.14% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.14% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.2% | 84.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 20.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$165M | −$71.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 8.9% |
Go deeper
- TTWO stock overview
- TTWO income statement
- TTWO valuation and score
- U stock overview
- U income statement
- U valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.