Figma vs Unity Software
FIG and U side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIG and U compare
Unity Software is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Figma ($21.9B against $10.1B).
Figma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.4% versus 20.9% for Unity Software).
Unity Software keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −15.6% compared with −40.2% at Figma.
Figma scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Unity Software), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIG | U |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.1B | $21.9B |
| Share price | $18.97 | $49.65 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.3% | 15.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 137% | −73.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.81 | 2.52 |
| Employees | – | 4,412 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 7.2× (better) | 10.0× |
| P/B | 6.5× (better) | 6.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 480× |
| P/FCF | 45.1× | 36.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.2% | 2.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $7.04 | $6.73 |
| Margin of safety | −170% (better) | −637% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.4% (better) | 20.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 19.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 81.4% (better) | 67.7% |
| Operating margin | −40.7% | −17.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −40.2% | −15.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.0% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −38.4% | −10.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −32.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −16.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.45 (better) | 2.16 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.80 (better) | 3.39 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.0% | 84.7% |
| Held by insiders | 45.7% | 20.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$88.3M | −$71.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.1% | 8.9% |
Go deeper
- FIG stock overview
- FIG income statement
- FIG valuation and score
- U stock overview
- U income statement
- U valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.