Targa Resources vs TC Energy
TRGP and TRP side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TRGP and TRP compare
TC Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.7% versus 4.7% for Targa Resources).
TC Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.1% compared with 13.5% at Targa Resources.
Targa Resources pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; TC Energy does not pay one.
Targa Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for TC Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TRGP | TRP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $63.8B | – |
| Share price | $297.33 | $64.53 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.3% | 20.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 455% | 35.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.38 |
| Employees | 3,570 | 6,059 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.3× | – |
| P/S | 3.5× | – |
| P/B | 16.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 68.3× | – |
| PEG | 0.88 | – |
| FCF yield | 1.5% | – |
| Fair value | $230.35 | – |
| Margin of safety | −29.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.7% | 10.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.6% (better) | 3.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 41.5% (better) | −25.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 52.4% (better) | −26.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 41.8% | 98.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 22.5% | 52.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.5% | 23.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | – |
| Return on equity | 75.0% (better) | 12.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 15.3% | 21.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.05 | 0.06 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.29 | 0.13 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.74 (better) | 0.63 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.69 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | – | 99.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 25.4% (better) | 0.97% |
| Buyback yield | 0.35% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.5% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.1% | 65.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.3% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.8M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | – |
Go deeper
- TRGP stock overview
- TRGP income statement
- TRGP valuation and score
- TRP stock overview
- TRP income statement
- TRP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.