STMicroelectronics vs Texas Instruments
STM and TXN side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How STM and TXN compare
Texas Instruments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.3% versus −11.1% for STMicroelectronics).
Texas Instruments keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.3% compared with 1.4% at STMicroelectronics.
Texas Instruments pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; STMicroelectronics does not pay one.
Texas Instruments scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 4 for STMicroelectronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | STM | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $277B |
| Share price | $46.73 | $303.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 94.7% | 86.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.6% | 55.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.54 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 49K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 39.4× |
| P/S | – | 13.4× |
| P/B | – | 14.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 33.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 37.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 2.6% |
| Fair value | – | $226.32 |
| Margin of safety | – | −34.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −11.1% | 20.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 4.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −89.3% | 41.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −89.2% | 41.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −31.6% | −1.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.9% | 60.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.5% | 40.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 34.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 35.2% |
| Return on equity | 0.94% | 39.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.55% | 29.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 0.71 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.83 | 0.64 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.36 | 5.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 13.27 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | 193% | 72.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.23% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 19.1% | 89.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.16% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$124M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- STM stock overview
- STM income statement
- STM valuation and score
- TXN stock overview
- TXN income statement
- TXN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.