Royal Gold vs SSR Mining
RGLD and SSRM side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RGLD and SSRM compare
Royal Gold is the larger company, worth 4.0 times as much as SSR Mining ($22.8B against $5.7B).
On earnings, SSR Mining is cheaper: it trades at 25.5× trailing earnings, against 27.1× for Royal Gold.
Royal Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (105% versus 48.4% for SSR Mining).
Royal Gold keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 47.7% compared with 12.3% at SSR Mining.
Both pay dividends: Royal Gold yields 0.71% and SSR Mining 0.11%.
SSR Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 20 for Royal Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RGLD | SSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.8B | $5.7B |
| Share price | $268.84 | $28.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.5% | 34.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 155% | 44.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.59 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 39 | 2,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.1× | 25.5× (better) |
| P/S | 12.9× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 1.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.8× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 16.3× |
| PEG | 2.04 | 0.92 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | 6.1% |
| Fair value | $216.37 | $29.77 |
| Margin of safety | −24.3% | 5.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 105% (better) | 48.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.5% (better) | 13.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 74.7% (better) | 44.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 36.3% | 41.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 36.2% (better) | 14.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.2% (better) | 62.6% |
| Operating margin | 62.0% (better) | 40.2% |
| Net margin | 47.7% (better) | 12.3% |
| FCF margin | – | 18.2% |
| Return on equity | 15.1% (better) | 7.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 15.2% | 28.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.03 | −2.04 |
| Interest coverage | – | 88.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.40 | 9.79 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 9.48 (better) | 5.64 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.71% (better) | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | 17.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.71% (better) | 0.11% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.7% | 70.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.29% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.4M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | – |
Go deeper
- RGLD stock overview
- RGLD income statement
- RGLD valuation and score
- SSRM stock overview
- SSRM income statement
- SSRM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.