Royal Gold vs SSR Mining
RGLD and SSRM side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RGLD and SSRM compare
Royal Gold is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as SSR Mining ($19.4B against $5.4B).
On earnings, SSR Mining is cheaper: it trades at 24.1× trailing earnings, against 25.0× for Royal Gold.
Royal Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (93.5% versus 48.4% for SSR Mining).
Royal Gold keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 47.7% compared with 12.3% at SSR Mining.
Both pay dividends: Royal Gold yields 0.83% and SSR Mining 0.11%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RGLD | SSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.4B | $5.4B |
| Share price | $228.77 | $26.48 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.4% | 18.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 118% | 51.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 39 | 2,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 | 21 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.0× | 24.1× (better) |
| P/S | 12.5× | 2.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.6× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.7× | 4.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 15.3× |
| PEG | 1.88 | 0.87 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | 6.5% |
| Fair value | $195.71 | $30.43 |
| Margin of safety | −16.9% | 13.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 93.5% (better) | 48.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.5% (better) | 13.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 64.2% (better) | 44.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 34.3% | 41.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 36.2% (better) | 14.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.8% (better) | 62.6% |
| Operating margin | 61.4% (better) | 40.2% |
| Net margin | 47.7% (better) | 12.3% |
| FCF margin | – | 18.2% |
| Return on equity | 13.5% (better) | 7.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.3% | 28.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.05 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.17 (better) | −2.04 |
| Interest coverage | – | 88.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.92 | 9.79 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.18 (better) | 5.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.83% (better) | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | 18.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.83% (better) | 0.11% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.7% | 70.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.30% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.8M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | – |
Go deeper
- RGLD stock overview
- RGLD income statement
- RGLD valuation and score
- SSRM stock overview
- SSRM income statement
- SSRM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.