Ryder System vs U-Haul
R and UHAL side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How R and UHAL compare
Ryder System and U-Haul are about the same size, with market caps of $10.8B and $10.7B.
Ryder System keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.0% compared with 2.7% at U-Haul.
Ryder System pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; U-Haul does not pay one.
Ryder System scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for U-Haul), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | R | UHAL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.8B | $10.7B |
| Share price | $282.00 | $55.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 63.1% | 5.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 235% | −25.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 52K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 3.6× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3× (better) | 20.6× |
| P/FCF | 11.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.9% (better) | −10.5% |
| Fair value | $165.46 | $40.05 |
| Margin of safety | −70.4% | −37.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.2% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 96.0% |
| Operating margin | – | 7.7% |
| Net margin | 4.0% (better) | 2.7% |
| FCF margin | 7.3% (better) | −18.4% |
| Return on equity | 17.1% (better) | 2.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.42 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.10 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.67 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 (better) | 1.33 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 28.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 37.3% |
| Held by insiders | 3.9% | 88.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$53.7M | −$14.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.2% | – |
Go deeper
- R stock overview
- R income statement
- R valuation and score
- UHAL stock overview
- UHAL income statement
- UHAL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.