Papa Johns International vs Wendy's
PZZA and WEN side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PZZA and WEN compare
Wendy's is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Papa Johns International ($1.6B against $632M).
On earnings, Wendy's is cheaper: it trades at 16.4× trailing earnings, against 25.6× for Papa Johns International.
Wendy's grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.32% versus −8.3% for Papa Johns International).
Wendy's keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.4% compared with 1.4% at Papa Johns International.
Both pay dividends: Papa Johns International yields 7.2% and Wendy's 5.9%.
Wendy's scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 13 for Papa Johns International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PZZA | WEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $632M | $1.6B |
| Share price | $19.19 | $8.34 |
| Change, 1 year | −56.4% | −2.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −85.6% | −62.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 9,400 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.6× | 16.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | – | 12.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8× (better) | 9.4× |
| P/FCF | 29.6× | 7.2× (better) |
| PEG | – | 13.57 |
| FCF yield | 3.4% | 13.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $29.91 | $13.70 |
| Margin of safety | 35.9% | 39.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.3% | −0.32% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.5% | 4.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −32.1% (better) | −47.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −33.6% (better) | −45.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.8% | 10.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.9% | 62.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | 12.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 4.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.1% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 82.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 21.1% (better) | 7.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 22.04 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.05 (better) | 5.60 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.77 | 1.89 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.41 (better) | 1.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.2% (better) | 5.9% |
| Payout ratio | 178% | 96.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.4% | 18.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.12% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.2% (better) | 6.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 114% | 94.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.9% | 17.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $0 |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 21.1% | 31.2% |
Go deeper
- PZZA stock overview
- PZZA income statement
- PZZA valuation and score
- WEN stock overview
- WEN income statement
- WEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.