Papa Johns International vs Wendy's
PZZA and WEN side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PZZA and WEN compare
Wendy's is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Papa Johns International ($1.4B against $608M).
On earnings, Wendy's is cheaper: it trades at 10.9× trailing earnings, against 23.4× for Papa Johns International.
Wendy's grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.98% versus −5.6% for Papa Johns International).
Wendy's keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with 1.4% at Papa Johns International.
Both pay dividends: Papa Johns International yields 7.5% and Wendy's 6.8%.
Wendy's scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for Papa Johns International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PZZA | WEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $608M | $1.4B |
| Share price | $18.45 | $7.21 |
| Change, 1 year | −64.8% | −16.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −86.0% | −68.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 0.65 |
| Employees | 9,400 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.4× | 10.9× (better) |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | – | 11.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.5× (better) | 8.3× |
| P/FCF | 17.7× | 5.2× (better) |
| PEG | – | 9.07 |
| FCF yield | 5.6% | 19.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $33.82 | $17.08 |
| Margin of safety | 45.4% | 57.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.6% | −0.98% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.5% | 4.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −63.4% | −34.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −65.2% | −31.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.8% | 10.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.7% | 63.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | 13.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 5.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.7% | 12.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 108% |
| Return on invested capital | 21.2% (better) | 8.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 22.82 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.96 (better) | 5.26 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.83 | 1.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.35 (better) | 1.03 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.5% (better) | 6.8% |
| Payout ratio | 223% | 84.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.4% | 18.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.5% | 8.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 114% | 94.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.9% | 17.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $17.8K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.7% | 30.9% |
Go deeper
- PZZA stock overview
- PZZA income statement
- PZZA valuation and score
- WEN stock overview
- WEN income statement
- WEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.