PulteGroup vs Toll Brothers
PHM and TOL side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PHM and TOL compare
PulteGroup is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Toll Brothers ($23.4B against $13.6B).
On earnings, Toll Brothers is cheaper: it trades at 11.9× trailing earnings, against 13.6× for PulteGroup.
Toll Brothers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.1% versus −9.3% for PulteGroup).
PulteGroup keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.2% compared with 11.1% at Toll Brothers.
Both pay dividends: PulteGroup yields 0.82% and Toll Brothers 0.70%.
Toll Brothers scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 13 for PulteGroup), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PHM | TOL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.4B | $13.6B |
| Share price | $127.01 | $147.85 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.3% | 9.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 143% | 124% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 6,506 | 4,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.6× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/S | 1.5× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.0× |
| P/FCF | 18.0× | 12.5× (better) |
| PEG | 40.88 | 1.61 (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.6% | 8.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $101.76 | $127.40 |
| Margin of safety | −24.8% | −16.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.3% | −1.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% (better) | 9.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.7% | −12.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −27.9% | −8.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.5% | 31.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 23.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 13.8% |
| Net margin | 11.2% (better) | 11.1% |
| FCF margin | 8.1% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.9% | 14.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.47 (better) | 3.28 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.82% (better) | 0.70% |
| Payout ratio | 10.8% | 8.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.0% | 17.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 5.7% (better) | 5.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.5% (better) | 5.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.1% | 94.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.67% | 0.74% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.4M | −$26.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- PHM stock overview
- PHM income statement
- PHM valuation and score
- TOL stock overview
- TOL income statement
- TOL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.