MaxLinear vs Sitime
MXL and SITM side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MXL and SITM compare
Sitime is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as MaxLinear ($14.2B against $5.5B).
Sitime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (143% versus 56.0% for MaxLinear).
Sitime keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.9% compared with −4.4% at MaxLinear.
Sitime scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for MaxLinear), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MXL | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $14.2B |
| Share price | $59.95 | $472.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 296% | 47.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −15.2% | 64.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.09 | 2.66 |
| Employees | 1,115 | 441 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 497× |
| P/S | 8.3× (better) | 20.8× |
| P/B | 10.2× | 4.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 148× | 123× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 343× |
| FCF yield | −0.38% | 0.29% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.04 | $59.95 |
| Margin of safety | −563% (better) | −688% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 56.0% | 143% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.46% | 23.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.0% (better) | 56.2% |
| Operating margin | −0.92% | 0.87% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.4% | 3.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.1% | 6.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.9% | 1.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.88% | 0.28% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.22 | – |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.22 | 5.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.73 (better) | 5.95 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.10% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.10% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.0% | 75.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 26.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$60.1M (better) | −$395M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- MXL stock overview
- MXL income statement
- MXL valuation and score
- SITM stock overview
- SITM income statement
- SITM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.