Madison Square Garden Entertainment vs MSG Knickerbockers
MSGE and MSGK side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSGE and MSGK compare
MSG Knickerbockers is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Madison Square Garden Entertainment ($7.8B against $3.8B).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus 13.1% for MSG Knickerbockers).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.6% compared with −1.3% at MSG Knickerbockers.
MSG Knickerbockers pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Madison Square Garden Entertainment does not pay one.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for MSG Knickerbockers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSGE | MSGK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.8B | $7.8B |
| Share price | $79.79 | $322.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.9% | 45.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 80.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 1,060 | 522 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 39.3× | – |
| P/S | 3.4× (better) | 6.7× |
| P/B | 317× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.5× (better) | 236× |
| FCF yield | – | −0.00% |
| Fair value | $60.48 | $34.68 |
| Margin of safety | −31.9% (better) | −830% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.4% (better) | 13.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 66.9% (better) | 22.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 176% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 190% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 16.2% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net margin | 8.6% (better) | −1.3% |
| FCF margin | – | −0.03% |
| Return on invested capital | 31.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 47.30 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.56 (better) | 7.60 |
| Interest coverage | 4.8× (better) | 1.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.62 (better) | 0.44 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.15 | 2.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 0.66% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.66% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | – |
| Held by insiders | 18.9% | 41.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$2.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 12.5% |
Go deeper
- MSGE stock overview
- MSGE income statement
- MSGE valuation and score
- MSGK stock overview
- MSGK income statement
- MSGK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.