Mach Natural Resources LP vs Riley Exploration Permian
MNR and REPX side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MNR and REPX compare
Mach Natural Resources LP is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Riley Exploration Permian ($1.5B against $984M).
On earnings, Riley Exploration Permian is cheaper: it trades at 9.6× trailing earnings, against 10.5× for Mach Natural Resources LP.
Riley Exploration Permian grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (45.5% versus 36.7% for Mach Natural Resources LP).
Riley Exploration Permian keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with 10.5% at Mach Natural Resources LP.
Both pay dividends: Mach Natural Resources LP yields 19.9% and Riley Exploration Permian 2.7%.
Riley Exploration Permian scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Mach Natural Resources LP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MNR | REPX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $984M |
| Share price | $9.03 | $44.40 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.6% | 71.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −37.2% | 116% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.21 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 840 | 122 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.5× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | – | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.2× | 3.2× (better) |
| Fair value | $15.88 | $58.75 |
| Margin of safety | 43.1% (better) | 24.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 36.7% | 45.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 142% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 37.7% (better) | 15.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.3% | 13.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 17.9% | 45.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.5% | 17.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 16.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 23.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.38 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.82 | 0.57 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 9.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.79 (better) | 0.41 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.12 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 19.9% (better) | 2.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 19.9% (better) | 2.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.5% | 69.8% |
| Held by insiders | 64.9% | 44.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$65.3M (better) | −$72.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.79% | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- MNR stock overview
- MNR income statement
- MNR valuation and score
- REPX stock overview
- REPX income statement
- REPX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.