Mirion Technologies vs Onto Innovation
MIR and ONTO side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MIR and ONTO compare
Onto Innovation is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Mirion Technologies ($10.0B against $4.4B).
On earnings, Onto Innovation is cheaper: it trades at 67.0× trailing earnings, against 161× for Mirion Technologies.
Onto Innovation grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.9% versus 19.6% for Mirion Technologies).
Onto Innovation keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.5% compared with 2.7% at Mirion Technologies.
Onto Innovation scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for Mirion Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MIR | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4B | $10.0B |
| Share price | $17.74 | $203.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −35.1% | 50.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 54.3% | 126% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 2.03 |
| Employees | 324 | 1,615 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 161× | 67.0× (better) |
| P/S | 4.0× (better) | 7.6× |
| P/B | 2.4× (better) | 5.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.4× (better) | 42.4× |
| P/FCF | 25.9× (better) | 40.4× |
| FCF yield | 3.9% (better) | 2.5% |
| Fair value | $11.21 | $131.11 |
| Margin of safety | −58.2% | −55.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 19.6% | 30.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.0% (better) | 12.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.4% (better) | −13.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.00% (better) | −14.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 34.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.1% | 51.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 15.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.7% | 11.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.6% | 18.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.6% | 7.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.1% | 18.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.25 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.16 | – |
| Current ratio | 3.02 | 6.78 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.95 | 4.70 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.2% (better) | 2.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 99.6% |
| Held by insiders | 7.6% | 0.93% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.5M | −$902K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.8% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- MIR stock overview
- MIR income statement
- MIR valuation and score
- ONTO stock overview
- ONTO income statement
- ONTO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.