Mirion Technologies vs Onto Innovation
MIR and ONTO side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MIR and ONTO compare
Onto Innovation is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Mirion Technologies ($9.9B against $4.6B).
On earnings, Onto Innovation is cheaper: it trades at 75.8× trailing earnings, against 204× for Mirion Technologies.
Mirion Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.7% versus 8.1% for Onto Innovation).
Onto Innovation keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.8% compared with 2.4% at Mirion Technologies.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MIR | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.6B | $9.9B |
| Share price | $18.37 | $201.57 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.3% | 47.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 63.1% | 117% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.54 | 1.99 |
| Employees | 324 | 1,615 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 11 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 204× | 75.8× (better) |
| P/S | 4.5× (better) | 8.8× |
| P/B | 2.5× (better) | 5.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.7× (better) | 59.5× |
| P/FCF | 34.2× (better) | 39.2× |
| FCF yield | 2.9% (better) | 2.6% |
| Fair value | $11.39 | $114.82 |
| Margin of safety | −61.3% (better) | −75.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.7% (better) | 8.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.0% (better) | 12.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 145% (better) | −33.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 200% (better) | −34.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 34.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.0% | 50.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 12.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.4% | 11.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 13.0% | 22.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.5% | 6.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.6% | 20.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.24 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.13 | – |
| Current ratio | 3.20 | 9.73 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.02 | 4.85 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.90% | 2.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.90% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 99.6% |
| Held by insiders | 12.5% | 0.94% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.0M | −$302K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.6% | 6.1% |
Go deeper
- MIR stock overview
- MIR income statement
- MIR valuation and score
- ONTO stock overview
- ONTO income statement
- ONTO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.