Miami International vs Virtu Financial
MIAX and VIRT side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MIAX and VIRT compare
Virtu Financial is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Miami International ($9.2B against $3.7B).
On earnings, Virtu Financial is cheaper: it trades at 8.7× trailing earnings, against 13.2× for Miami International.
Virtu Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.1% versus 14.0% for Miami International).
Miami International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.8% compared with 14.2% at Virtu Financial.
Virtu Financial pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Miami International does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MIAX | VIRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.7B | $9.2B |
| Share price | $37.08 | $59.33 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.2% | 64.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 108% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 439 | 1,027 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 12 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.2× | 8.7× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.0× (better) | 4.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 16.7× | 10.5× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.31 |
| FCF yield | 6.0% | 9.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $38.85 | $73.11 |
| Margin of safety | 4.6% | 18.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.0% | 26.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 2.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 48.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 47.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −0.12% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.9% | – |
| Operating margin | 10.9% | – |
| Net margin | 19.8% (better) | 14.2% |
| FCF margin | 14.6% | 19.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 28.9% | 36.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 34.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −3.52 | – |
| Interest coverage | 533× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.10 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 7.06 (better) | 0.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.71% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.71% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.6% | 52.9% |
| Held by insiders | 23.0% | 98.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$85.8M | −$14.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.3% | 255% |
Go deeper
- MIAX stock overview
- MIAX income statement
- MIAX valuation and score
- VIRT stock overview
- VIRT income statement
- VIRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.