Interactive Brokers vs Virtu Financial
IBKR and VIRT side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IBKR and VIRT compare
Interactive Brokers is the larger company, worth 4.0 times as much as Virtu Financial ($37.4B against $9.2B).
On earnings, Virtu Financial is cheaper: it trades at 8.7× trailing earnings, against 31.7× for Interactive Brokers.
Virtu Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.1% versus 20.8% for Interactive Brokers).
Both pay dividends: Interactive Brokers yields 0.41% and Virtu Financial 1.6%.
Virtu Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Interactive Brokers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IBKR | VIRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $37.4B | $9.2B |
| Share price | $82.49 | $59.51 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.0% | 65.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 343% | 108% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 3,182 | 1,027 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.7× | 8.7× (better) |
| P/S | 13.3× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 6.0× | 4.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 10.5× |
| PEG | 0.95 | 0.31 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | 9.5% |
| Fair value | $49.84 | $73.54 |
| Margin of safety | −65.5% | 19.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.8% | 26.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 2.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 48.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 25.6% | 47.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.7% (better) | −0.12% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | – | 14.2% |
| FCF margin | – | 19.9% |
| Return on equity | – | 36.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.14 | 0.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.41% | 1.6% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.41% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.7% | 52.9% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 98.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$34.8M | −$14.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 255% |
Go deeper
- IBKR stock overview
- IBKR income statement
- IBKR valuation and score
- VIRT stock overview
- VIRT income statement
- VIRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.