Miami International vs Virtu Financial
MIAX and VIRT side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MIAX and VIRT compare
Virtu Financial is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Miami International ($8.3B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Virtu Financial is cheaper: it trades at 8.9× trailing earnings, against 38.7× for Miami International.
Virtu Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.8% versus 16.8% for Miami International).
Virtu Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with 9.7% at Miami International.
Virtu Financial pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Miami International does not pay one.
Virtu Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Miami International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MIAX | VIRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $8.3B |
| Share price | $33.63 | $53.76 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.1% | 56.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 92.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 439 | 1,027 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 38.7× | 8.9× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 2.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× (better) | 4.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 13.3× (better) | 16.0× |
| PEG | – | 0.32 |
| FCF yield | 7.5% (better) | 6.2% |
| Fair value | $21.53 | $67.11 |
| Margin of safety | −56.2% | 19.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.8% | 20.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 2.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7832% (better) | 36.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 37.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −0.12% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.3% | – |
| Operating margin | 7.9% | – |
| Net margin | 9.7% | 13.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 17.1% (better) | 12.8% |
| Return on equity | 12.4% | 33.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 23.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −4.41 | – |
| Interest coverage | 31.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.61 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 5.75 (better) | 0.44 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.6% | 52.9% |
| Held by insiders | 23.2% | 98.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$79.3M | −$15.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.6% | 234% |
Go deeper
- MIAX stock overview
- MIAX income statement
- MIAX valuation and score
- VIRT stock overview
- VIRT income statement
- VIRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.