McDonalds vs Yum Brands
MCD and YUM side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MCD and YUM compare
Yum Brands is the larger company, worth 227362 times as much as McDonalds ($44.0B against $194K).
Yum Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.1% versus 5.8% for McDonalds).
Yum Brands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 39.1% compared with 32.4% at McDonalds.
Both pay dividends: McDonalds yields 2.7% and Yum Brands 1.8%.
McDonalds scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 15 for Yum Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MCD | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $194K | $44.0B |
| Share price | $271.97 | $161.33 |
| Change, 1 year | −11.4% | 8.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 7.9% | 27.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.50 |
| Employees | 150K | 49K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.0× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 5.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9× (better) | 12.1× |
| P/FCF | 0.0× (better) | 27.2× |
| PEG | – | 1.94 |
| FCF yield | 3868470% (better) | 3.7% |
| Fair value | $136950000.00 | $247.85 |
| Margin of safety | 100.0% (better) | 34.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.8% | 9.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 7.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 138% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 143% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 13.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 67.4% |
| Operating margin | 46.9% | 49.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 32.4% | 39.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 27.0% (better) | 18.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.5% | 93.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.86 | 2.53 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 8.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.23 (better) | 0.96 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.87 | 3.45 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% (better) | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | 58.7% | 23.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.3% | 8.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1210480% (better) | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 1210480% (better) | 5.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 74.6% | 89.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.5M | −$11.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.6% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- MCD stock overview
- MCD income statement
- MCD valuation and score
- YUM stock overview
- YUM income statement
- YUM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.