McDonalds vs Yum Brands
MCD and YUM side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MCD and YUM compare
Yum Brands is the larger company, worth 230110 times as much as McDonalds ($42.4B against $184K).
Yum Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.3% versus 6.3% for McDonalds).
McDonalds keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.7% compared with 25.4% at Yum Brands.
Both pay dividends: McDonalds yields 2.9% and Yum Brands 1.9%.
McDonalds scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 13 for Yum Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MCD | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $184K | $42.4B |
| Share price | $258.12 | $155.40 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.6% | 11.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.3% | 22.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 150K | 49K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.6× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 4.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9× (better) | 19.3× |
| P/FCF | 0.0× (better) | 25.3× |
| PEG | – | 2.93 |
| FCF yield | 4211120% (better) | 4.0% |
| Fair value | $158484000.00 | $160.79 |
| Margin of safety | 100.0% (better) | 3.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.3% | 10.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 7.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.7% | 54.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 56.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 13.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 68.1% |
| Operating margin | 46.2% (better) | 31.0% |
| Net margin | 31.7% (better) | 25.4% |
| FCF margin | 28.0% (better) | 19.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.1% | 48.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.94 (better) | 4.91 |
| Interest coverage | 7.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.08 (better) | 0.59 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.86 (better) | 2.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% (better) | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | 59.5% | 36.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.3% | 8.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1262090% (better) | 2.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 1262090% (better) | 4.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 74.6% | 89.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.5M | −$13.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- MCD stock overview
- MCD income statement
- MCD valuation and score
- YUM stock overview
- YUM income statement
- YUM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.