Lucky Strike Entertainment vs TKO
LUCK and TKO side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LUCK and TKO compare
TKO is the larger company, worth 86 times as much as Lucky Strike Entertainment ($37.8B against $439M).
TKO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.8% versus 1.8% for Lucky Strike Entertainment).
TKO keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.2% compared with −3.8% at Lucky Strike Entertainment.
Both pay dividends: Lucky Strike Entertainment yields 7.5% and TKO 1.6%.
TKO scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Lucky Strike Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LUCK | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $439M | $37.8B |
| Share price | $3.22 | $199.50 |
| Change, 1 year | −59.4% | 11.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −68.0% | 279% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.64 |
| Employees | 14K | 4,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 53.8× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 6.8× |
| P/B | – | 11.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× (better) | 24.6× |
| P/FCF | 24.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.1% | – |
| Fair value | – | $112.21 |
| Margin of safety | – | −77.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.8% | 19.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.8% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 25.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 42.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.9% | 21.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.8% | 5.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.4% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 8.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | 15.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.37 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.61 | 2.35 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.6× |
| Current ratio | 0.50 | 1.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.41 | 3.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.5% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 82.0% |
| Buyback yield | 6.9% (better) | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 14.3% (better) | 4.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 50.4% | 38.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.0M (better) | −$61.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
Go deeper
- LUCK stock overview
- LUCK income statement
- LUCK valuation and score
- TKO stock overview
- TKO income statement
- TKO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.