Lucky Strike Entertainment vs TKO
LUCK and TKO side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LUCK and TKO compare
TKO is the larger company, worth 62 times as much as Lucky Strike Entertainment ($34.2B against $551M).
TKO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.1% versus 3.7% for Lucky Strike Entertainment).
TKO keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.3% compared with −2.9% at Lucky Strike Entertainment.
Both pay dividends: Lucky Strike Entertainment yields 5.9% and TKO 1.7%.
TKO scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Lucky Strike Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LUCK | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $551M | $34.2B |
| Share price | $4.04 | $180.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −49.5% | −3.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −59.8% | 208% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 14K | 4,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 63.4× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 6.5× |
| P/B | – | 10.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.6× (better) | 25.1× |
| FCF yield | −1.8% | – |
| Fair value | – | $96.54 |
| Margin of safety | – | −87.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% | 5.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.8% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 11.0% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.9% | 4.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.79% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 6.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.4% | 12.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.36 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.55 | 2.65 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.50 | 1.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.43 | 3.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.9% (better) | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 105% |
| Buyback yield | 6.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 12.1% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 50.4% | 38.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.5M (better) | −$61.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
Go deeper
- LUCK stock overview
- LUCK income statement
- LUCK valuation and score
- TKO stock overview
- TKO income statement
- TKO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.