Lattice Semiconductor vs Rambus
LSCC and RMBS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and RMBS compare
Lattice Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Rambus ($17.4B against $9.1B).
On earnings, Rambus is cheaper: it trades at 35.1× trailing earnings, against 472× for Lattice Semiconductor.
Lattice Semiconductor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.3% versus 17.3% for Rambus).
Rambus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.4% compared with 5.6% at Lattice Semiconductor.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.4B | $9.1B |
| Share price | $122.77 | $85.36 |
| Change, 1 year | 83.1% | −22.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 46.2% | 213% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.84 | 1.75 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 791 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 12 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 472× | 35.1× (better) |
| P/S | 26.8× | 11.5× (better) |
| P/B | 22.1× | 6.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 360× | 27.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 87.6× | 29.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | 3.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $11.01 | $85.65 |
| Margin of safety | −1015% | 0.34% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% (better) | 17.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 23.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | 16.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% | 15.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% | 79.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.4% | 36.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.6% | 33.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 30.6% | 39.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.9% | 19.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% | 38.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 245× |
| Current ratio | 3.02 | 9.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 57.01 (better) | 41.14 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.20% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.20% | 1.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 94.0% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 0.78% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.0M (better) | −$20.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- RMBS stock overview
- RMBS income statement
- RMBS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.