Lead Real Estate vs PulteGroup
LRE and PHM side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LRE and PHM compare
Lead Real Estate grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.5% versus −9.3% for PulteGroup).
PulteGroup keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.2% compared with 3.5% at Lead Real Estate.
PulteGroup pays a dividend yielding 0.82%; Lead Real Estate does not pay one.
PulteGroup scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for Lead Real Estate), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LRE | PHM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $23.4B |
| Share price | $1.08 | $127.01 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.0% | 5.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −93.3% | 143% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.98 |
| Employees | – | 6,506 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.6× |
| P/S | – | 1.5× |
| P/B | – | 1.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 18.0× |
| PEG | – | 40.88 |
| FCF yield | – | 5.6% |
| Fair value | – | $101.76 |
| Margin of safety | – | −24.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% (better) | −9.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% (better) | 9.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −24.2% (better) | −31.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −24.2% (better) | −27.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.1% | 16.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 5.1% | – |
| Net margin | 3.5% | 11.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −29.2% | 8.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.58 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.46 | – |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.47 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.82% |
| Payout ratio | 21.2% | 10.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.7% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 6.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.1% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 89.8% | 0.67% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$26.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- LRE stock overview
- LRE income statement
- LRE valuation and score
- PHM stock overview
- PHM income statement
- PHM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.