Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs Lockheed Martin
KTOS and LMT side by side, both in transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KTOS and LMT compare
Lockheed Martin is the larger company, worth 22 times as much as Kratos Defense & Security Solutions ($138B against $6.4B).
On earnings, Lockheed Martin is cheaper: it trades at 21.2× trailing earnings, against 283× for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.2% versus 7.9% for Lockheed Martin).
Lockheed Martin keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.2% compared with 1.3% at Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.
Lockheed Martin pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; Kratos Defense & Security Solutions does not pay one.
Lockheed Martin scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KTOS | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.4B | $138B |
| Share price | $33.91 | $596.04 |
| Change, 1 year | −55.8% | 30.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 67.7% | 74.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 4,300 | 110K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 283× | 21.2× (better) |
| P/S | 3.9× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 13.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 59.6× | 13.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 16.4× |
| FCF yield | −1.9% | 6.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $26.24 | $546.40 |
| Margin of safety | −29.2% | −9.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.2% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.5% (better) | 2.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.0% | 55.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.00% | 57.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −28.0% | −2.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.0% (better) | 11.7% |
| Operating margin | 0.39% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 8.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.5% | 10.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.81% | 80.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.24% | 32.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 2.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.32 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.6× |
| Current ratio | 5.42 (better) | 1.26 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.94 (better) | 3.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 49.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.4% |
| Buyback yield | −21.2% | 0.54% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −21.2% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.7% | 75.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 0.07% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$131M | −$124K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 1.3% |
Go deeper
- KTOS stock overview
- KTOS income statement
- KTOS valuation and score
- LMT stock overview
- LMT income statement
- LMT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.