Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs Lockheed Martin
KTOS and LMT side by side, both in transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KTOS and LMT compare
Lockheed Martin is the larger company, worth 19 times as much as Kratos Defense & Security Solutions ($147B against $7.7B).
On earnings, Lockheed Martin is cheaper: it trades at 23.5× trailing earnings, against 242× for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.5% versus 7.2% for Lockheed Martin).
Lockheed Martin keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.2% compared with 2.0% at Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.
Lockheed Martin pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Kratos Defense & Security Solutions does not pay one.
Lockheed Martin scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KTOS | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.7B | $147B |
| Share price | $41.09 | $636.95 |
| Change, 1 year | −55.0% | 31.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 83.7% | 87.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 0.33 |
| Employees | 4,300 | 110K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 242× | 23.5× (better) |
| P/S | 5.1× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× (better) | 16.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 76.3× | 17.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 16.8× |
| FCF yield | −1.7% | 5.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $26.47 | $480.46 |
| Margin of safety | −55.2% | −32.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.5% (better) | 7.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.5% (better) | 2.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 113% (better) | 49.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 88.9% (better) | 52.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −28.0% | −2.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.0% (better) | 11.8% |
| Operating margin | 1.2% | 11.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.0% | 8.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −8.5% | 11.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.1% | 89.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.84% | 30.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 2.34 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.83 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.2× |
| Current ratio | 5.54 (better) | 1.19 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.72 (better) | 3.80 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 50.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.4% |
| Buyback yield | −17.5% | 1.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −17.5% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.7% | 75.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 0.07% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$135M | −$124K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 1.2% |
Go deeper
- KTOS stock overview
- KTOS income statement
- KTOS valuation and score
- LMT stock overview
- LMT income statement
- LMT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.