Kraft Heinz vs Altria
KHC and MO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KHC and MO compare
Altria is the larger company, worth 4.5 times as much as Kraft Heinz ($129B against $28.8B).
Altria grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.47% versus −1.5% for Kraft Heinz).
Altria keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.5% compared with −14.0% at Kraft Heinz.
Both pay dividends: Kraft Heinz yields 6.6% and Altria 5.5%.
Altria scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for Kraft Heinz), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KHC | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.8B | $129B |
| Share price | $24.27 | $77.39 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.45% | 34.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −31.3% | 78.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 35K | 5,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 16.0× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 5.5× |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.3× |
| P/FCF | 8.1× (better) | 14.2× |
| PEG | – | 1.80 |
| FCF yield | 12.3% (better) | 7.0% |
| Fair value | $36.11 | $77.37 |
| Margin of safety | 32.8% (better) | −0.03% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% | 0.47% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.97% (better) | −2.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −8.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −7.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 11.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.5% | 63.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −13.4% | 47.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −14.0% | 34.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.3% | 38.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −9.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −4.7% | 43.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.50 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.89 |
| Interest coverage | −5.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.02 (better) | 0.58 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.50 | 5.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.6% (better) | 5.5% |
| Payout ratio | – | 87.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 4.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.28% | 0.79% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.9% (better) | 6.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.2% | 64.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.49% | 0.14% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$2.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- KHC stock overview
- KHC income statement
- KHC valuation and score
- MO stock overview
- MO income statement
- MO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.