Campbell'S vs Kraft Heinz
CPB and KHC side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPB and KHC compare
Kraft Heinz is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Campbell'S ($29.8B against $6.8B).
Kraft Heinz grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.5% versus −5.0% for Campbell'S).
Campbell'S keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with −14.0% at Kraft Heinz.
Both pay dividends: Campbell'S yields 6.2% and Kraft Heinz 6.4%.
Kraft Heinz scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Campbell'S), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPB | KHC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.8B | $29.8B |
| Share price | $22.77 | $25.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.0% | 1.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −43.9% | −28.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.09 | 0.19 |
| Employees | 14K | 35K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 1.8× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 10.0× | 8.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 10.0% | 11.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $28.43 | $34.91 |
| Margin of safety | 19.9% | 28.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.0% | −1.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.8% (better) | −0.97% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −33.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −16.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.1% | 33.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.7% (better) | −13.4% |
| Net margin | 4.1% (better) | −14.0% |
| FCF margin | 7.0% | 14.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.4% (better) | −9.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.1% (better) | −4.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.85 | 0.50 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.33 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.6× (better) | −5.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.82 | 1.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.52 (better) | 0.52 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.2% | 6.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 117% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.38% (better) | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% | 6.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.1% | 90.2% |
| Held by insiders | 38.5% | 0.49% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$390K (better) | −$2.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 21.1% | 8.7% |
Go deeper
- CPB stock overview
- CPB income statement
- CPB valuation and score
- KHC stock overview
- KHC income statement
- KHC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.