Keurig Dr Pepper vs Molson Coors Beverage
KDP and TAP side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KDP and TAP compare
Keurig Dr Pepper is the larger company, worth 7.4 times as much as Molson Coors Beverage ($52.1B against $7.0B).
On earnings, Molson Coors Beverage is cheaper: it trades at 8.4× trailing earnings, against 35.1× for Keurig Dr Pepper.
Keurig Dr Pepper grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.0% versus −2.3% for Molson Coors Beverage).
Keurig Dr Pepper keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.1% compared with 6.9% at Molson Coors Beverage.
Both pay dividends: Keurig Dr Pepper yields 2.4% and Molson Coors Beverage 4.8%.
Molson Coors Beverage scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Keurig Dr Pepper), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KDP | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $52.1B | $7.0B |
| Share price | $38.25 | $39.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 46.4% | −15.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.8% | −13.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.37 |
| Employees | 31K | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.1× | 8.4× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.3× | 6.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.4× | 6.0× (better) |
| PEG | 2.36 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 16.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $28.51 | $104.47 |
| Margin of safety | −34.2% | 62.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 43.0% (better) | −2.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.4% (better) | 2.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.0% (better) | 30.8% |
| Operating margin | 15.6% (better) | 10.2% |
| Net margin | 7.1% (better) | 6.9% |
| FCF margin | 10.1% (better) | 9.1% |
| Return on equity | 6.5% | 8.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.9% | 6.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.14 | 0.59 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.66 | 2.63 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | 0.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.96 | 1.46 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 4.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 76.0% | 40.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.9% | 27.0% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 8.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% | 12.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 4.7% | 14.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1M | $45.3K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | – |
Go deeper
- KDP stock overview
- KDP income statement
- KDP valuation and score
- TAP stock overview
- TAP income statement
- TAP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.