Keurig Dr Pepper vs Primo Brands
KDP and PRMB side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KDP and PRMB compare
Keurig Dr Pepper is the larger company, worth 5.7 times as much as Primo Brands ($49.5B against $8.7B).
On earnings, Keurig Dr Pepper is cheaper: it trades at 33.3× trailing earnings, against 42.6× for Primo Brands.
Keurig Dr Pepper grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.0% versus 4.5% for Primo Brands).
Keurig Dr Pepper keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.1% compared with 3.1% at Primo Brands.
Both pay dividends: Keurig Dr Pepper yields 2.5% and Primo Brands 1.9%.
Primo Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Keurig Dr Pepper), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KDP | PRMB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $49.5B | $8.7B |
| Share price | $36.34 | $23.88 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.1% | 48.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 3.4% | 28.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.29 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 31K | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.3× (better) | 42.6× |
| P/S | 2.1× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 2.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.6× | 11.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.3× | 20.9× (better) |
| PEG | 2.25 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.7% | 4.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $27.69 | $22.61 |
| Margin of safety | −31.3% | −5.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 43.0% (better) | 4.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.0% (better) | 29.4% |
| Operating margin | 15.6% (better) | 8.6% |
| Net margin | 7.1% (better) | 3.1% |
| FCF margin | 10.1% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | 6.5% | 6.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.9% (better) | 5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.14 (better) | 1.69 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.66 | 3.94 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | 1.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.94 | 1.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% (better) | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | 76.0% | 81.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | 4.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 4.7% | 59.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1M (better) | −$993M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 20.2% |
Go deeper
- KDP stock overview
- KDP income statement
- KDP valuation and score
- PRMB stock overview
- PRMB income statement
- PRMB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.