ITT vs Timken
ITT and TKR side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ITT and TKR compare
ITT is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Timken ($19.2B against $7.7B).
On earnings, Timken is cheaper: it trades at 27.4× trailing earnings, against 44.2× for ITT.
ITT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.8% versus 5.9% for Timken).
ITT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.1% compared with 5.9% at Timken.
Both pay dividends: ITT yields 0.70% and Timken 1.3%.
ITT scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for Timken), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ITT | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.2B | $7.7B |
| Share price | $215.01 | $110.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.5% | 40.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 107% | 54.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 12K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 44.2× | 27.4× (better) |
| P/S | 3.7× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 4.0× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.1× | 12.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 29.7× | 17.3× (better) |
| PEG | 3.77 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.4% | 5.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $144.25 | $99.30 |
| Margin of safety | −49.1% | −11.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 35.8% (better) | 5.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.7% (better) | 5.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −13.5% | −4.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −19.3% | −4.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 49.1% (better) | 2.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.7% (better) | 31.3% |
| Operating margin | 14.0% (better) | 11.0% |
| Net margin | 8.1% (better) | 5.9% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% (better) | 9.2% |
| Return on equity | 11.3% (better) | 8.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.1% (better) | 8.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.74 | 0.61 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.94 | 1.99 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.4× (better) | 5.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.29 | 2.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.07 | 3.25 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 1.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 31.5% | 35.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.7% (better) | 4.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.91% | 1.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.7% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.60% | 2.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.8M (better) | −$16.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- ITT stock overview
- ITT income statement
- ITT valuation and score
- TKR stock overview
- TKR income statement
- TKR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.