Regal Rexnord vs Timken
RRX and TKR side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RRX and TKR compare
Regal Rexnord is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Timken ($11.7B against $7.5B).
On earnings, Timken is cheaper: it trades at 27.0× trailing earnings, against 36.4× for Regal Rexnord.
Timken grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.9% versus 3.5% for Regal Rexnord).
Timken keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 5.4% at Regal Rexnord.
Both pay dividends: Regal Rexnord yields 0.79% and Timken 1.3%.
Timken scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Regal Rexnord), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RRX | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.7B | $7.5B |
| Share price | $176.41 | $108.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.9% | 38.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.8% | 52.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 29K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.4× | 27.0× (better) |
| P/S | 1.9× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.5× | 12.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 25.2× | 17.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.0% | 5.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $141.62 | $99.17 |
| Margin of safety | −24.6% | −9.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% | 5.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.3% (better) | 5.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 29.4% (better) | −4.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.0% (better) | −4.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −1.8% | 2.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.8% (better) | 31.3% |
| Operating margin | 11.7% (better) | 11.0% |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 5.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.7% | 9.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.8% | 8.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.2% | 8.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 | 0.61 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.90 | 1.99 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× | 5.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.28 | 2.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.02 | 3.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | 1.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 28.7% | 35.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | 4.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.79% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.56% | 2.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.4M | −$16.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- RRX stock overview
- RRX income statement
- RRX valuation and score
- TKR stock overview
- TKR income statement
- TKR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.