Flowserve vs ITT
FLS and ITT side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLS and ITT compare
ITT is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Flowserve ($19.2B against $10.6B).
On earnings, Flowserve is cheaper: it trades at 42.0× trailing earnings, against 44.2× for ITT.
Both pay dividends: Flowserve yields 1.0% and ITT 0.70%.
ITT scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for Flowserve), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLS | ITT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.6B | $19.2B |
| Share price | $83.66 | $214.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.6% | 12.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 158% | 106% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 16K | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 42.0× (better) | 44.2× |
| P/S | – | 3.7× |
| P/B | 4.6× | 4.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.8× (better) | 22.0× |
| P/FCF | 69.0× | 29.7× (better) |
| PEG | 1.88 (better) | 3.76 |
| FCF yield | 1.4% | 3.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $56.60 | $143.68 |
| Margin of safety | −47.8% (better) | −49.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 35.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 9.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −43.7% | −13.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −42.2% | −19.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.4% | 49.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 35.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 14.0% |
| Net margin | – | 8.1% |
| FCF margin | – | 12.5% |
| Return on equity | 11.1% | 11.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 11.3% (better) | 9.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.89 | 0.74 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.28 (better) | 2.94 |
| Interest coverage | 5.1× | 5.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.10 (better) | 1.29 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.14 (better) | 3.07 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.70% |
| Payout ratio | 43.1% | 31.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 13 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.98% | 15.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.91% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.3% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 98.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.63% | 0.60% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.7M | −$12.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- FLS stock overview
- FLS income statement
- FLS valuation and score
- ITT stock overview
- ITT income statement
- ITT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.