Imperial Oil vs PBF Energy
IMO and PBF side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IMO and PBF compare
PBF Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.5% versus 15.7% for Imperial Oil).
Imperial Oil keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.9% compared with 7.0% at PBF Energy.
PBF Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Imperial Oil does not pay one.
PBF Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for Imperial Oil), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IMO | PBF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $8.5B |
| Share price | $126.70 | $69.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.6% | 75.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 275% | 446% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.38 |
| Employees | 5,000 | 3,678 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 3.1× |
| P/S | – | 0.2× |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 2.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 3.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 31.0% |
| Fair value | – | $171.39 |
| Margin of safety | – | 59.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.7% | 31.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.0% (better) | 14.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 51.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 60.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 8.9% |
| Operating margin | – | 9.8% |
| Net margin | 10.9% (better) | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 11.3% (better) | 6.8% |
| Return on equity | 25.2% | 41.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 39.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.14 (better) | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.06 (better) | −0.11 |
| Interest coverage | – | 25.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.30 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 4.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | 25.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 26.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.5% | 86.4% |
| Held by insiders | 67.9% | 27.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.0B |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- IMO stock overview
- IMO income statement
- IMO valuation and score
- PBF stock overview
- PBF income statement
- PBF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.