Imperial Oil vs PBF Energy
IMO and PBF side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IMO and PBF compare
PBF Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.5% versus 4.5% for Imperial Oil).
Imperial Oil keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.0% compared with 7.0% at PBF Energy.
PBF Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Imperial Oil does not pay one.
PBF Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 7 for Imperial Oil), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IMO | PBF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $9.2B |
| Share price | $138.10 | $78.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 49.5% | 129% |
| Change, 5 years | 307% | 431% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 5,000 | 3,678 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 3.5× |
| P/S | – | 0.2× |
| P/B | – | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 2.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 3.5× |
| FCF yield | – | 28.4% |
| Fair value | – | $233.11 |
| Margin of safety | – | 66.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.5% | 31.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.0% (better) | 14.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −11.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 8.9% |
| Operating margin | – | 9.8% |
| Net margin | 8.0% (better) | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 9.7% (better) | 6.8% |
| Return on equity | 16.8% | 41.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 39.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.14 (better) | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.08 (better) | −0.11 |
| Interest coverage | – | 25.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.38 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 4.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.4% |
| Payout ratio | 36.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 26.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.5% | 88.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 27.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$994M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 13.8% |
Go deeper
- IMO stock overview
- IMO income statement
- IMO valuation and score
- PBF stock overview
- PBF income statement
- PBF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.