StockData

ICL vs Mosaic

ICL and MOS side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ICL and MOS compare

ICL grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.6% versus 0.02% for Mosaic).

ICL keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.2% compared with −9.4% at Mosaic.

Mosaic pays a dividend yielding 4.0%; ICL does not pay one.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricICLMOS
Size and price
Market cap–$7.0B
Share price$4.52$21.92
Change, 1 year−17.8%−13.9%
Change, 5 years−52.3%−39.5%
Beta (5Y)0.740.81
Employees13K13K
StockData Score
Total score77
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score00
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score02 (better)
Valuation
P/S–0.6×
P/B–0.6×
EV/EBITDA–21.8×
FCF yield–−11.6%
Fair value–$30.79
Margin of safety–28.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.6% (better)0.02%
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.2% (better)6.8%
Net income growth (TTM)−44.5% (better)−191%
EPS growth (TTM)−43.8% (better)−191%
EPS growth, 5Y average78.3% (better)−0.58%
Profitability
Gross margin30.6% (better)7.4%
Operating margin8.1% (better)−5.1%
Net margin3.2% (better)−9.4%
FCF margin–−6.8%
Return on equity3.9% (better)−9.3%
Return on invested capital4.8% (better)−2.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.39 (better)0.48
Net debt / EBITDA1.70 (better)9.12
Interest coverage1.9×–
Current ratio1.331.50 (better)
Altman Z-score–1.60
Piotroski F-score58 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–4.0%
Payout ratio99.1%–
Years of dividend growth–1
Dividend growth, 5Y average–34.5%
Shareholder yield–4.0%
Ownership
Held by institutions15.2%95.4%
Held by insiders0.02%0.31%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$509K
Short interest, % of float0.29%11.8%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.