CF Industries vs Mosaic
CF and MOS side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CF and MOS compare
CF Industries is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Mosaic ($18.7B against $7.2B).
CF Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.9% versus 0.02% for Mosaic).
Both pay dividends: CF Industries yields 1.7% and Mosaic 3.9%.
CF Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 5 for Mosaic), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CF | MOS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $18.7B | $7.2B |
| Share price | $123.24 | $22.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 48.8% | −11.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 89.0% | −37.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.15 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 2,900 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.7× | – |
| P/S | 2.3× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 3.3× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× (better) | 22.3× |
| P/FCF | 9.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.2% (better) | −11.2% |
| Fair value | $243.90 | – |
| Margin of safety | 49.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.9% (better) | 0.02% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | 6.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −191% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 70.7% (better) | −191% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 43.6% (better) | −0.58% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.5% (better) | 7.4% |
| Operating margin | 41.6% (better) | −5.1% |
| Net margin | – | −9.4% |
| FCF margin | 26.2% (better) | −6.8% |
| Return on equity | – | −9.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 37.6% (better) | −2.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.56 | 0.48 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.60 (better) | 9.12 |
| Interest coverage | 11.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.98 (better) | 1.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.38 (better) | 1.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | 3.9% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | 34.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 5.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% (better) | 3.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 95.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.59% | 0.31% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$72.2M | −$509K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 11.8% |
Go deeper
- CF stock overview
- CF income statement
- CF valuation and score
- MOS stock overview
- MOS income statement
- MOS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.