Host Hotels & Resorts vs Realty Income
HST and O side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HST and O compare
Realty Income is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Host Hotels & Resorts ($56.1B against $17.5B).
On earnings, Host Hotels & Resorts is cheaper: it trades at 18.8× trailing earnings, against 40.9× for Realty Income.
Realty Income grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.8% versus 5.0% for Host Hotels & Resorts).
Both pay dividends: Host Hotels & Resorts yields 6.5% and Realty Income 5.0%.
Realty Income scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Host Hotels & Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HST | O |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.5B | $56.1B |
| Share price | $25.50 | $59.26 |
| Change, 1 year | 41.2% | 3.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 49.6% | −16.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.39 |
| Employees | 162 | 395 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.8× (better) | 40.9× |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 9.0× |
| P/B | 2.8× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4× (better) | 14.8× |
| PEG | 2.43 | – |
| Fair value | $24.66 | $53.72 |
| Margin of safety | −3.4% (better) | −10.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% | 10.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.4% (better) | 28.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 26.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.5% | 34.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 0.52% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 14.8% | – |
| Net margin | 15.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 14.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 16.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.04 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.28 |
| Interest coverage | 3.9× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.33 (better) | 1.03 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.5% (better) | 5.0% |
| Payout ratio | 122% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 36.6% (better) | 2.9% |
| Buyback yield | 0.43% (better) | −3.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 78.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.62% | 0.15% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.9M | −$874K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 4.5% |
Go deeper
- HST stock overview
- HST income statement
- HST valuation and score
- O stock overview
- O income statement
- O valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.