StockData

Hippo vs Root

HIPO and ROOT side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How HIPO and ROOT compare

Hippo is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Root ($975M against $681M).

On earnings, Root is cheaper: it trades at 9.3× trailing earnings, against 30.0× for Hippo.

Hippo grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 7.9% for Root).

Hippo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 5.2% at Root.

Root scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Hippo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricHIPOROOT
Size and price
Market cap$975M$681M
Share price$36.61$43.97
Change, 1 year9.0%−51.6%
Change, 5 years−62.3%−45.6%
Beta (5Y)1.421.85
Employees5401,256
StockData Score
Total score59 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score23 (better)
Health score01 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E30.0×9.3× (better)
P/S1.8×0.4× (better)
P/B–2.1×
EV/EBITDA–0.7×
P/FCF7.7×–
FCF yield13.0%–
Fair value–$47.16
Margin of safety–6.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)20.6% (better)7.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average55.5% (better)34.3%
Net income growth (TTM)−66.6%41.9% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−66.9%46.7% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin–6.7%
Net margin5.9% (better)5.2%
FCF margin23.4%–
Return on equity7.6%27.4% (better)
Financial health
Interest coverage–5.9×
Altman Z-score−0.150.16 (better)
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−0.36%–
Shareholder yield−0.36%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions43.7%60.9%
Held by insiders9.3%40.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.1M (better)−$3.1M
Short interest, % of float3.3%22.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.