Gold.com vs Genuine Parts
GOLD and GPC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GOLD and GPC compare
Genuine Parts is the larger company, worth 16 times as much as Gold.com ($17.0B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Gold.com is cheaper: it trades at 12.0× trailing earnings, against 474× for Genuine Parts.
Gold.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (110% versus 5.3% for Genuine Parts).
Gold.com keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.34% compared with 0.12% at Genuine Parts.
Both pay dividends: Gold.com yields 5.0% and Genuine Parts 3.4%.
Gold.com scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 7 for Genuine Parts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GOLD | GPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $17.0B |
| Share price | $36.22 | $123.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.8% | −3.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.1% | −8.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 1,355 | 65K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.0× (better) | 474× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× (better) | 37.9× |
| P/FCF | 2.8× (better) | 22.3× |
| FCF yield | 35.4% (better) | 4.5% |
| Fair value | $68.08 | $47.54 |
| Margin of safety | 46.8% (better) | −159% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 110% (better) | 5.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.4% (better) | 8.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1048% (better) | −96.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 975% (better) | −95.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −19.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 1.9% | 37.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.34% (better) | 0.12% |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | 3.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.4% (better) | 0.66% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 1.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.61 | 7.71 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.15 | 1.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.25 (better) | 2.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% (better) | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | 62.0% | 1861% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 3.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 59.3% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 32.3% | 0.65% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.6M | −$668K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.8% | 4.7% |
Go deeper
- GOLD stock overview
- GOLD income statement
- GOLD valuation and score
- GPC stock overview
- GPC income statement
- GPC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.