Six Flags Entertainment vs TKO
FUN and TKO side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FUN and TKO compare
TKO is the larger company, worth 33 times as much as Six Flags Entertainment ($37.8B against $1.1B).
TKO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.8% versus −7.1% for Six Flags Entertainment).
TKO keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.2% compared with −31.9% at Six Flags Entertainment.
TKO pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Six Flags Entertainment does not pay one.
TKO scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for Six Flags Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FUN | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $37.8B |
| Share price | $11.10 | $199.50 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.1% | 11.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −77.0% | 279% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 0.64 |
| Employees | 4,225 | 4,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 53.8× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 6.8× |
| P/B | – | 11.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 24.6× |
| P/FCF | 7.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 13.0% | – |
| Fair value | – | $112.21 |
| Margin of safety | – | −77.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.1% | 19.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 76.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 25.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 42.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 91.5% | – |
| Operating margin | −18.8% | 21.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −31.9% | 5.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | – |
| Return on equity | −510% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −8.7% | 15.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.37 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.35 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.6× |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | 1.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.38 | 3.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 82.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 38.8% |
| Held by insiders | 14.2% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $21.5M (better) | −$61.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 31.7% | – |
Go deeper
- FUN stock overview
- FUN income statement
- FUN valuation and score
- TKO stock overview
- TKO income statement
- TKO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.