Six Flags Entertainment vs TKO
FUN and TKO side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FUN and TKO compare
TKO is the larger company, worth 45 times as much as Six Flags Entertainment ($34.2B against $765M).
TKO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.1% versus −3.5% for Six Flags Entertainment).
TKO keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.3% compared with −57.3% at Six Flags Entertainment.
TKO pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Six Flags Entertainment does not pay one.
TKO scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 1 for Six Flags Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FUN | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $765M | $34.2B |
| Share price | $7.48 | $180.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −68.5% | −3.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −84.9% | 208% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 4,225 | 4,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 63.4× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 6.5× |
| P/B | 6.7× (better) | 10.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 25.1× |
| P/FCF | 5.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 19.6% | – |
| Fair value | $2.43 | $96.54 |
| Margin of safety | −208% | −87.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% | 5.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 76.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 91.4% | – |
| Operating margin | −44.2% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −57.3% | 4.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.9% | – |
| Return on equity | −185% | 6.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −17.9% | 12.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 43.47 | 1.36 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.65 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.42 | 1.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.67 | 3.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 105% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 38.8% |
| Held by insiders | 8.0% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $6.4M (better) | −$61.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 24.5% | – |
Go deeper
- FUN stock overview
- FUN income statement
- FUN valuation and score
- TKO stock overview
- TKO income statement
- TKO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.