Five Point vs Millrose Properties
FPH and MRP side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FPH and MRP compare
Millrose Properties is the larger company, worth 6.3 times as much as Five Point ($4.3B against $673M).
Millrose Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 63.2% compared with 24.9% at Five Point.
Millrose Properties pays a dividend yielding 12.0%; Five Point does not pay one.
Millrose Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Five Point), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FPH | MRP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $673M | $4.3B |
| Share price | $4.55 | $25.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −26.7% | −20.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.5% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 90 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 8.5× |
| P/S | 5.7× | 5.4× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.1× (better) | 6.2× |
| P/FCF | 112× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.89% | – |
| Fair value | $8.44 | $43.35 |
| Margin of safety | 46.1% (better) | 40.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −39.1% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.5% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −68.8% | 161% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 85.2% |
| Net margin | 24.9% | 63.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 8.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 11.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 4.2× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.63 | 0.83 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 12.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 99.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 12.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.3% | 85.5% |
| Held by insiders | 21.0% | 14.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$693K | $6.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.59% | 7.5% |
Go deeper
- FPH stock overview
- FPH income statement
- FPH valuation and score
- MRP stock overview
- MRP income statement
- MRP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.