Ford Motor vs Li Auto
F and LI side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How F and LI compare
Ford Motor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.4% versus −22.3% for Li Auto).
Ford Motor pays a dividend yielding 3.7%; Li Auto does not pay one.
Ford Motor scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Li Auto), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | F | LI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $48.9B | – |
| Share price | $12.25 | $12.14 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.9% | −39.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.8% | −60.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 0.78 |
| Employees | 169K | 6,041 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.3× | – |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 9.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.5% | – |
| Fair value | $18.71 | – |
| Margin of safety | 34.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.4% (better) | −22.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.1% | 64.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −279% | −85.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.4% | 18.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.8% | −0.46% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.8% (better) | −11.4% |
| Return on invested capital | −146% | −3.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.13 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −12.97 |
| Interest coverage | −5.0× | −3.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.08 | 1.81 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.83 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 38.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.64% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 65.4% | 1.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.93% | 43.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.1M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | – |
Go deeper
- F stock overview
- F income statement
- F valuation and score
- LI stock overview
- LI income statement
- LI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.