Eagle Materials vs Tecnoglass
EXP and TGLS side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXP and TGLS compare
Eagle Materials is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Tecnoglass ($5.5B against $2.1B).
On earnings, Eagle Materials is cheaper: it trades at 15.0× trailing earnings, against 21.1× for Tecnoglass.
Tecnoglass grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.5% versus 1.6% for Eagle Materials).
Eagle Materials keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.1% compared with 9.0% at Tecnoglass.
Both pay dividends: Eagle Materials yields 0.55% and Tecnoglass 0.96%.
Tecnoglass scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Eagle Materials), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXP | TGLS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $180.79 | $46.69 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.8% | 0.30% |
| Change, 5 years | 12.2% | 45.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 2,800 | 9,601 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.0× (better) | 21.1× |
| P/S | 2.4× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 3.6× | 2.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.2× |
| P/FCF | 35.7× | – |
| PEG | 8.16 (better) | 14.03 |
| FCF yield | 2.8% (better) | −3.6% |
| Fair value | $193.07 | $40.03 |
| Margin of safety | 6.4% (better) | −16.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.6% | 12.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.3% | 21.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −15.7% (better) | −45.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.1% (better) | −42.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | 46.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.8% | 37.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 14.4% |
| Net margin | 16.1% (better) | 9.0% |
| FCF margin | 6.6% (better) | −6.8% |
| Return on equity | 24.5% (better) | 12.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 11.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.14 | 0.36 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.95 |
| Current ratio | 3.29 (better) | 1.90 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.69 | 3.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.96% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 8.3% | 27.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 58.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.5% (better) | 5.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.0% (better) | 6.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 46.2% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 92.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.7M | $27.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 62.9% |
Go deeper
- EXP stock overview
- EXP income statement
- EXP valuation and score
- TGLS stock overview
- TGLS income statement
- TGLS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.