EQT vs Pembina Pipeline
EQT and PBA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQT and PBA compare
EQT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.6% versus 5.3% for Pembina Pipeline).
EQT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.4% compared with 21.8% at Pembina Pipeline.
EQT pays a dividend yielding 0.95%; Pembina Pipeline does not pay one.
EQT scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 3 for Pembina Pipeline), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQT | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $32.8B | – |
| Share price | $52.36 | $50.31 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.7% | 32.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 151% | 52.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.39 |
| Employees | 1,523 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.4× | – |
| P/S | 3.5× | – |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.6% | – |
| Fair value | $56.83 | – |
| Margin of safety | 7.9% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.6% (better) | 5.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.1% (better) | 5.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 49.1% (better) | −9.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 45.0% (better) | −11.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 83.5% (better) | 41.1% |
| Operating margin | 41.8% (better) | 36.1% |
| Net margin | 28.4% (better) | 21.8% |
| FCF margin | 40.7% | – |
| Return on equity | 10.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.83 (better) | 3.05 |
| Interest coverage | 11.2× (better) | 4.7× |
| Current ratio | 0.71 (better) | 0.61 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.30 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | – |
| Payout ratio | 15.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 84.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.95% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.3% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.69% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.7M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | – |
Go deeper
- EQT stock overview
- EQT income statement
- EQT valuation and score
- PBA stock overview
- PBA income statement
- PBA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.