EquipmentShare.com vs United Rentals
EQPT and URI side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQPT and URI compare
United Rentals is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as EquipmentShare.com ($69.6B against $3.9B).
United Rentals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.3% compared with 1.4% at EquipmentShare.com.
United Rentals pays a dividend yielding 0.53%; EquipmentShare.com does not pay one.
United Rentals scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 1 for EquipmentShare.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQPT | URI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.9B | $69.6B |
| Share price | $15.42 | $1124.56 |
| Change, 1 year | – | 30.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 200% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 1.44 |
| Employees | 8,206 | 1,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 24.7× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/B | 3.1× (better) | 7.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× (better) | 17.1× |
| PEG | – | 2.69 |
| Fair value | $13.85 | $763.80 |
| Margin of safety | −11.4% (better) | −47.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 9.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 13.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 25.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% | 39.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.1% | 25.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.3% | 30.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% | 14.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.38 | 1.51 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.63 | 2.95 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.45 (better) | 0.80 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.45 | 3.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.53% |
| Payout ratio | – | 17.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 42.6% | 92.7% |
| Held by insiders | 43.4% | 0.29% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.9M | −$30.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.5% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- EQPT stock overview
- EQPT income statement
- EQPT valuation and score
- URI stock overview
- URI income statement
- URI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.