EquipmentShare.com vs United Rentals
EQPT and URI side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQPT and URI compare
United Rentals is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as EquipmentShare.com ($72.8B against $4.4B).
On earnings, United Rentals is cheaper: it trades at 28.1× trailing earnings, against 1718× for EquipmentShare.com.
EquipmentShare.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.3% versus 6.9% for United Rentals).
United Rentals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.7% compared with 0.91% at EquipmentShare.com.
United Rentals pays a dividend yielding 0.66%; EquipmentShare.com does not pay one.
United Rentals scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for EquipmentShare.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQPT | URI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4B | $72.8B |
| Share price | $17.18 | $1170.05 |
| Change, 1 year | – | 34.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 199% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 1.43 |
| Employees | 8,206 | 1,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 1718× | 28.1× (better) |
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 4.3× |
| P/B | 3.6× (better) | 7.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× (better) | 18.8× |
| PEG | – | 3.05 |
| Fair value | $12.25 | $684.53 |
| Margin of safety | −40.3% (better) | −70.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.3% (better) | 6.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 13.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1233% (better) | 4.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 7.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 25.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.3% | 38.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.8% | 24.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.91% | 15.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | 28.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | 13.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.00 | 1.54 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.82 | 3.06 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.42 (better) | 0.76 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.44 | 3.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.66% |
| Payout ratio | 92.5% | 18.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 2.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 42.6% | 92.2% |
| Held by insiders | 43.4% | 0.29% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.7M | −$30.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.5% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- EQPT stock overview
- EQPT income statement
- EQPT valuation and score
- URI stock overview
- URI income statement
- URI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.